python 2.7 - Inverting the ModelSerializer order with Django-Rest-Framework -


using python v2.7, django 1.10, drf 3.x related other pending question at: including data in django intermediate table in django-rest-framework serializer i'm getting set of serializers i've built:

{     "id": 11,     "asset_number": "1234",     "serial_number": "1234",     "name": "instrument1",     "checksum_string": "0123456789abcdef0123",     "instr_type": {         "id": 70,         "make": "make1",         "model": "model1",         "service_email": "model1@company.com",         "service_website": "www.model1.com"     },     "validated_versions": [{         "id": 9,         "method": {             "id": 9,             "name": "method1",             "description": "method 1 description"         },         "version_name": "123",         "cmd_line_script": "script",         "sop": "sop"     }, {         "id": 10,         "method": {             "id": 10,             "name": "method2",             "description": "method 2 description"         },         "version_name": "123",         "cmd_line_script": "script",         "sop": "sop"     }, {         "id": 12,         "method": {             "id": 10,             "name": "method2",             "description": "method 2 description"         },         "version_name": "456",         "cmd_line_script": "script",         "sop": "sop"     }] }

but notice there's lot of redundancy in data, want have show method child of instrument, methods have version associated instrument being serialized. want versions of method listed children of method, excluding versions of method not validated on instrument. want instead:

{     "id": 11,     "asset_number": "1234",     "serial_number": "1234",     "name": "instrument1",     "checksum_string": "0123456789abcdef0123",     "instr_type": {         "id": 70,         "make": "make1",         "model": "model1",         "service_email": "model1@company.com",         "service_website": "www.model1.com"     },     "validated_methods": [{         "id": 9,         "name": "method1",         "description": "method 1 description",         "valid_versions": [{             "id": 9,             "version_name": "123",             "cmd_line_script": "script",             "sop": "sop"         }]     }, {         "id": 10,         "name": "method2",         "description": "method 2 description",         "valid_versions": [{             "id": 10,             "version_name": "123",             "cmd_line_script": "script",             "sop": "sop"         }, {             "id": 12,             "version_name": "456",             "cmd_line_script": "script",             "sop": "sop"         }]     }] }

here's serializers currently, in case helps:

class userserializer(serializers.modelserializer):     class meta:         model = settings.auth_user_model         excludes = 'password'  class userprofileserializer(serializers.modelserializer):     #user = serializers.serialize(settings.auth_user_model, read_only=true)     user = userserializer(read_only=true)     class meta:         model = userprofile.user         #fields = ('last_login', 'is_superuser', 'username', 'first_name', 'last_name', 'email', 'is_staff', 'is_active', 'date_joined')         fields = '__all__'         #excludes = ('password',)  class instrtypeserializer(serializers.modelserializer):     class meta:         model = instrtype         fields = '__all__'  class methodserializer(serializers.modelserializer):     description = serializers.readonlyfield(source='descripton')     class meta:         model = method         fields = ('id', 'name', 'description')  class versionserializer(serializers.modelserializer):     method = methodserializer(read_only=true)     #instr_version = instr_versionserializer(source='instr_version_set', many=true, read_only=true)     class meta:         model = version         fields = ('id', 'method')#, 'version_number', 'cmd_line_script', 'sop')  class instr_to_versionserializer(serializers.modelserializer):     version = versionserializer(source='fk_version', read_only=true, many=true)     validator = userprofileserializer(source='validating_user.user', read_only=true)     #validator = serializers.readonlyfield(source='self.validating_user.user.email')     version_name = serializers.readonlyfield(source='version_number')     cmd_line_script = serializers.readonlyfield()     sop = serializers.readonlyfield()     method = methodserializer(source='fk_method',read_only=true)     time_validated = serializers.readonlyfield(source= 'timestamp')      class meta:         model = instr_version         fields = ('id', 'version', 'validator', 'time_validated', 'method', 'version_name', 'cmd_line_script', 'sop')   class instrumentserializer(serializers.modelserializer):     instr_type = instrtypeserializer(source='fk_instr_type', read_only=true)     validated_versions = instr_to_versionserializer(source='versionsfrominstrument', many=true, read_only=true)      class meta:         model = instrument         fields = ('id', 'asset_number', 'serial_number', 'name', 'checksum_string', 'instr_type', 'validated_versions')

thanks in advance, everyone.


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

asynchronous - C# WinSCP .NET assembly: How to upload multiple files asynchronously -

i using winscp .net assembly uploading files. want upload multiple files asynchronous way. have created method works single upload. public class uploadingdata { private sessionoptions _sessionoptions; private session _session; //connection etc private void onconnected() { foreach (var fileinfo in localfileslist) { var task = task.factory.startnew(() => uploadfilesasync(fileinfo)); } } private async task uploadfilesasync(string file) { string remotefilepath = _session.translatelocalpathtoremote(file, @"/", "/test_data_upload"); var uploading = _session.putfiles(file, remotefilepath, false); //when done await task.run(() => thread.sleep(1000)); } } please suggest me correct way. thanks you can use backgroundworker class this: string[] images = new string[50]; foreach (var path in images) { backgroundworker
Read more

aws api gateway - SerializationException in posting new Records via Dynamodb Proxy Service in API -

i getting "__type": "com.amazon.coral.service#serializationexception" as reply in postman & in test console in api gateway trying post record directly dynamodb using api proxy services.. referring aws article - https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/compute/using-amazon-api-gateway-as-a-proxy-for-dynamodb/ here's mapping { "tablename": "tablenamegoeshere", "item": { "id" : "$context.requestid" "eventname" : "$input.path('$.eventname')", "timestamp" : $input.path('$.timestamp'), "answers": "$util.parsejson($input.path('$.answers'))" } } update: did asked ... , worked if try add array of json objects gives me above same error - here's trying now. please - couldnt find on google well #set($inputroot = $input.path('$')) { "tablename": "answer", "item": {
Read more

asp.net - Problems sending emails from forum -

i have been redesigning site has message board, has been written guy looked after site. it has few problems , written in .asp , uses .mdb files database. you can see whole thing here . feel free post if helps, test thing have set using original files , new database. the basic problem when posts message, supposed email sent them, have posted it. when replies, originator supposed message, replier has been posted. i’d have thought @ point in process there should script/file in postmessage.asp? the postmessage.asp page below. <% option explicit %> <!-- #include virtual="common/adovbs.inc" --> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=windows-1252"> <meta name="generator" content="microsoft frontpage 4.0"> <meta name="progid" content="frontpage.editor.document"> <title>new page 2</title> <base target="_self"
Read more